American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Nuclear Science and Engineering / Volume 199 / Number 8

User Impressions and Gait Analysis of Exoskeleton Device Usage in Generalized Tank Farm Activities

Janelle Bottom, David Wood, Tamzidul Mina, Savannah Bradley, Michal Rittikaidachar, Alexandria Miera, Jason Wheeler

Nuclear Science and Engineering / Volume 199 / Number 8 / August 2025 / Pages 1337-1350

Research Article / dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2024.2316948

Received:November 4, 2023
Accepted:February 5, 2024
Published:June 11, 2025

Tank farm workers involved in nuclear cleanup activities perform physically demanding tasks, typically while wearing heavy personal protective equipment (PPE). Exoskeleton devices have the potential to bring considerable benefit to this industry but have not been thoroughly studied in the context of nuclear cleanup. In this paper, we examine the performance of exoskeletons during a series of tasks emulating jobs performed on tank farms while participants wore PPE commonly deployed by tank farm workers. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of commercially available lower-body exoskeletons on a user’s gait kinematics and user perceptions. Three participants each tested three lower-body exoskeletons in a 70-min protocol consisting of level treadmill walking, incline treadmill walking, weighted treadmill walking, a weight lifting session, and a hand tool dexterity task. Results were compared to a no exoskeleton baseline condition and evaluated as individual case studies. The three participants showed a wide spectrum of user preferences and adaptations toward the devices. Individual case studies revealed that some users quickly adapted to select devices for certain tasks while others remained hesitant to use the devices. Temporal effects on gait change and perception were also observed for select participants in device usage over the course of the device session. Device benefit varied between tasks, but no conclusive aggregate trends were observed across devices for all tasks. Evidence suggests that device benefits observed for specific tasks may have been overshadowed by the wide array of tasks used in the protocol.