American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Nuclear Technology / Volume 206 / Number 10

An Efficient 1-D Thermal Stratification Model for Pool-Type Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactors

Cihang Lu, Zeyun Wu, Sarah Morgan, James Schneider, Mark Anderson, Liangyu Xu, Emilio Baglietto, Matthew Bucknor, Matthew Weathered, Sama Bilbao y Leon

Nuclear Technology / Volume 206 / Number 10 / October 2020 / Pages 1465-1480

Technical Paper / dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1719799

Received:September 9, 2019
Accepted:January 20, 2020
Published:October 16, 2020

Investigating thermal stratification in the upper plenum of a sodium fast reactor (SFR) is currently a technology gap in SFR safety analysis. Understanding thermal stratification will promote safe operation of the SFR before its commercial deployment. Stratified layers of liquid sodium with a large vertical temperature gradient could be established in the upper plenum of an SFR during a down-power or a loss-of-flow transient. These stratified layers are unstable and could result in uncertainties for the core safety of an SFR. In order to predict the occurrence of the thermal stratification efficiently, we developed a one-dimensional (1-D) transport model to estimate the temperature profile of the ambient fluid in the upper plenum. This model demands much less computational effort than computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes and provides calculations with higher fidelity than historical system-level codes. Two flow conditions were considered separately in the current study depending on if in-vessel components are presented in the upper plenum. For the condition where in-vessel components, specifically the upper internal structure, are presented, we assumed that the impinging sodium was evenly dispersed in the ambient fluid within the distance between the bottom of the in-vessel component and the jet inlet surface. For the condition where no in-vessel components are presented, we assumed that the impinging sodium was evenly dispersed in the ambient fluid within the jet length, which was determined through data-driven trainings. The newly developed 1-D model showed similar performance with the CFD model in both cases. However, due to the assumption of flat profiles of the impinging jet axial dispersion rate, nonnegligible discrepancies between the 1-D prediction and the measured data were observed.