Home / Publications / Journals / Nuclear Technology / Volume 123 / Number 3
Nuclear Technology / Volume 123 / Number 3 / September 1998 / Pages 320-334
Technical Paper / Radiation Biology and Medicine / dx.doi.org/10.13182/NT98-A2902
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The neutron fields produced by several moderator assemblies were evaluated using both in-phantom and in-air neutron field assessment parameters. The parameters were used to determine the best moderator assembly, from among those evaluated, for use in our accelerator-based neutron source for boron neutron capture therapy. For a 10-mA proton beam current and the specified treatment parameters, a moderator assembly consisting of a BeO moderator and a Li2CO3 reflector was found to be the best moderator assembly whether the comparison was based on in-phantom or in-air neutron field assessment parameters. However, the parameters were discordant regarding the moderator thickness. The in-phantom neutron field assessment parameters predict 20 cm of BeO as the best moderator thickness, whereas the in-air neutron field assessment parameters predict 25 cm of BeO as the best moderator thickness.