American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Nuclear Science and Engineering / Volume 199 / Number 11

Equilibrium Core Model for Micro Pebble Bed Reactors Using OpenMC

Ragai Altamimi, Donald Doyle, Jason R. Trelewicz, Nicholas R. Brown

Nuclear Science and Engineering / Volume 199 / Number 11 / November 2025 / Pages 1971-1985

Research Article / dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2025.2474878

Received:July 23, 2024
Accepted:February 12, 2025
Published:September 30, 2025

Estimating the equilibrium state for pebble bed reactors (PBRs) presents complex challenges as it requires simultaneous consideration of changes in the pebbles’ movement as well as their fuel compositions. Whereas traditional approaches use multigroup diffusion codes for neutronics calculations of PBRs’ equilibrium state, the double-heterogeneity of PBRs complicates neutron cross-section generation. Continuous-energy Monte Carlo (MC) methods are better suited for detailed PBR analysis because of their natural handling of double-heterogeneity, but they demand substantially more computational resources. This study introduces a novel method for efficiently estimating the equilibrium state in small and micro PBRs with reduced computational cost. The method is anticipated to accelerate the processes of core design and performing parametric studies for utilizing advanced fuel and structural materials. The HTR-10 reactor design was used for validating the method’s predictions and evaluating its computational efficiency. When compared to reference calculation values from the literature, criticality (k-effective) was predicted to be approximately within the margin of error of the MC transport calculation, average core power density (in megawatts per cubic meter) was predicted within 2.5% relative error, and maximum thermal flux (1013 n/cm2.s−1) was predicted within 1.8% relative error. The calculated inventory of fission products and fuel composition in the equilibrium core were within 15% and 16.6%, respectively, when compared to reported values from the literature. The difference is attributed to variance in the considered values of the core temperature, which was found to significantly affect the depletion analyses.