American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Nuclear Science and Engineering / Volume 195 / Number 4

Validation of Continuous-Energy ENDF/B-VIII.0 16O, 56Fe, and 63,65Cu Cross Sections for Nuclear Criticality Safety Applications

Alex Shaw, Farzad Rahnema, Andrew Holcomb, Doug Bowen

Nuclear Science and Engineering / Volume 195 / Number 4 / April 2021 / Pages 412-436

Technical Paper / dx.doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2020.1830621

Received:June 10, 2020
Accepted:September 26, 2020
Published:March 12, 2021

Recently completed cross-section evaluations sponsored in part by the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program were incorporated into the 2018 release of the ENDF/B-VIII.0 cross-section library. Evaluated isotopes of interest to the nuclear data and criticality safety community include 16O, 56Fe, and 63,65Cu. For performance validation, benchmark models defined in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project Handbook were selected based on energy-integrated keff sensitivities to total cross sections of interest and compared with experimental values. Of the 102 benchmark configurations that were utilized, 63 are sensitive to 16O, 32 sensitive to 63,65Cu, and 25 sensitive to 56Fe. Selected benchmarks were modeled in SCALE 6.2.3 Criticality Safety Analysis Sequence (CSAS) continuous-energy Monte Carlo keff calculations with ENDF/B-VII.1, with a hybrid ENDF/B-VII.1 with ENDF/B-VIII.0 data substituted for individual isotopes of interest, and with ENDF/B-VIII.0. ENDF/B-VIII.0 showed improved agreement with experimental keff for 56Fe, 63Cu, elemental copper, and full library substitution while producing lessened agreement for 16O and 65Cu. With full library and isotope-specific ENDF/B-VIII.0 performance, a best-case ENDF library was formed by excluding underperforming isotopes’ ENDF/B-VIII.0 data, reverting 16O and 65Cu cross sections to ENDF/B-VII.1. This resulted in the average relative deviation between calculated and experimental data improving from 1.45σ for the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library to 1.32σ for the best-case library, relative to benchmark uncertainty.