American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 74 / Number 3

Preliminary Comparison of Wet Bypass Accident Consequences Between ITER and a Helium-Cooled Fusion Power Plant

Shanqi Chen, Daochuan Ge, Zhen Wang, Jiangtao Jia, Zhibin Chen, Liqin Hu

Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 74 / Number 3 / October 2018 / Pages 238-245

Technical Note / dx.doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2018.1461966

Received:December 1, 2017
Accepted:April 3, 2018
Published:September 12, 2018

No-public evacuation is an expectation for fusion power plants (FPPs) from the public and governments. In this technical note, a preliminary consequence assessment of an ITER wet bypass–like accident (the accident with the most severe consequence in ITER) of a helium-cooled deuterium-tritium tokamak FPP is performed and compared with that of ITER. Ideal gas–based methodology is proposed to evaluate the released materials in accidents, which is verified by typical accident cases in FPPs. The verification indicates that, compared with the best estimated codes, the proposed method is much simpler and easier with effectiveness. The accident assessment shows that this helium-cooled FPP design may still need public evacuation if the accident happens, which demonstrates the requirement of further investigations for FPP accidents. Some suggestions are proposed to improve the safety of FPPs based on the assessment.