American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Publications / Journals / Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 67 / Number 2

Tritium Accountancy in Fusion Systems

J. E. Klein, E. A. Clark, C. D. Harvel, D. A. Farmer, M. L. Moore, L. L. Tovo, A. S. Poorea

Fusion Science and Technology / Volume 67 / Number 2 / March 2015 / Pages 420-423

Proceedings of TRITIUM 2013 / dx.doi.org/10.13182/FST14-T44

First Online Publication:January 19, 2015
Updated:February 27, 2015

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has clearly defined requirements for nuclear material control and accountability (MC&A) of tritium whereas the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) does not since tritium is not a fissile material. MC&A requirements are expected for tritium fusion machines and will be dictated by the host country or regulatory body where the machine is operated.  Material Balance Areas (MBAs) are defined to aid in the tracking and reporting of nuclear material movements and inventories.  Material sub-accounts (MSAs) are established along with key measurement points (KMPs) to further subdivide a MBA to localize and minimize uncertainties in the inventory difference (ID) calculations for tritium accountancy.  Fusion systems try to minimize tritium inventory which may require continuous movement of material through the MSAs.  The ability of making meaningful measurements of these material transfers is described in terms of establishing the MSA structure to perform and reconcile ID calculations.  For fusion machines, changes to the traditional ID equation will be discussed which includes breading, burn-up, and retention of tritium in the fusion device.  The concept of “net” tritium quantities consumed or lost in fusion devices is described in terms of inventory taking strategies and how it is used to track the accumulation of tritium in components or fusion machines. `